基于数据包络分析的城市环境绩效评估研究     

翁俊豪  徐鹤 《未来与发展》2016,(3):49-57

随着环境问题日益凸显,我国不断增加环保投入,制定并施行环保政策,如何客观评价其成果和不足并确定未来工作方向也成为各方关注焦点。环境绩效评估则是衡量环境管理成效的重要工具之一。本文尝试将数据包络法应用到城市环境绩效评估研究中去,从投入和产出的角度构建城市环境绩效指标框架,对我国30个重点城市2012年的环境绩效进行实证评估,分析其环境绩效状况及改进目标,并对数据包络法在环境绩效评估中的适用性提出一定见解,希望能对我国环境绩效评估方法研究以及环境管理实践工作有所启示。  相似文献   

大型科研院所的综合竞争力评价研究   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4       下载免费PDF全文

柴国荣  徐渝  董书宁 《科研管理》2006,27(3):110-115

大型科研院所的竞争环境在转制后发生了质的变化,如何科学评价其综合竞争力具有重要的理论意义和实践价值。本文构建了大型科研院所的竞争力评价指标体系,设计了兼顾"功能性"和"协调性"的综合性评价方法,最后运用于煤炭科学研究总院下辖某分院的综合竞争力评价,并根据评价结果对其市场竞争态势进行了分析。  相似文献   

数字图书馆评估指标体系研究   总被引：11，自引：0，他引：11  

张会田 《情报科学》2005,23(10):1542-1545,1563

本文提出高校数字图书馆评估指标体系的制订要注重五大指导原则：评估体系的导向性原则、评价对象的确定性原则、评价标准通用性和灵活性原则、评价体系科学性原则、评价手段技术性原则。同时，文章论述了基于层次结构分析的评估思路与方法，并着重从数字图书馆办馆条件、数字化馆藏资源、网络化信息服务水平与信息利用率、数字图书馆馆员队伍、数字图书馆综合效益五个方面系统性地论述了数字图书馆评估体系的构建。  相似文献   

图书馆知识服务水平的模糊综合评价探讨   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

吕顺利 《现代情报》2007,27(8):40-43

文章简述了图书馆知识服务的概念及其图书馆知识服务水平评价的意义,构建了一套图书馆知识服务水平评价的指标体系,应用模糊数学中综合评价方法,对图书馆知识服务水平进行综合评价,并运用“最大隶属度”原则,评价出图书馆知识服务水平。  相似文献   

观赏园艺公司的增值管理     

王彩波 《科技与管理》2007,9(2):60-62

针对观赏园艺公司存在的主要问题，引入增值管理的理念，从市场预测、供求风险、产品生产、产品养护、产品高附加值和人力资本等6个方面，详细阐释了增值管理的措施；探讨并建立了评价体系和指标，为优化观赏园艺公司的管理提供了新思路。  相似文献   

社会科学交叉科学定量评价中的引文分析方法   总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6  

姜春林 《研究与发展管理》2003,15(1):47-51

从社会科学,交叉科学及其评价的概念和意义出发,探讨了CSSC的特点及其在评价社会科学交叉科学方面的重要作用,针对引证分析和同行评议的固有缺陷,指出定量定性相结合的评价思路,必定是今后评价的主要方式。  相似文献   

面向政府决策的知识管理系统构建与评估   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

胡红亮 《科学学与科学技术管理》2006,27(11):72-76,81

以科技情报行业的传统信息服务向面向政府决策（尤其是战略决策）的知识服务与管理系统的建设为例子，提出了对政府决策知识管理系统的内容需求和功能需求，探索对系统的评估方法，以推动知识管理思想在政府决策中的应用。  相似文献   

基于生态位理论的高校核心能力评价方法研究   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

纪秋颖  林健 《中国软科学》2006,(9):145-150

本文借鉴生态学中的生态位理论，阐明高校生态位的基本理论。在此基础上，对高校核心能力进行了分析，将高校核心能力解剖为反映高校“态”属性的占有能力、反映高校“态”和“势”界面属性的适应能力、反映高校“势”属性的进化能力三个层面及其相应的三个测度：生态位高低、生态位适宜度、生态位进化动量：提出了基于高校生态位的高校核心能力综合评价方法，并进行了实证分析。  相似文献   

Government research evaluations and academic freedom: a UK and Australian comparison     

Ann Martin-Sardesai  Helen Irvine  Stuart Tooley  James Guthrie 《高等教育研究与发展》2017,36(2):372-385

Performance management systems have been an inevitable consequence of the development of government research evaluations (GREs) of university research, and have also inevitably affected the working life of academics. The aim of this paper is to track the development of GREs over the past 25 years, by critically evaluating their adoption in the UK and Australian higher education sector and their contribution to the commodification of academic labour, and to highlight the resultant tensions between GREs and academic freedom. The paper employs a literature-based analysis, relying on publicly available policy documents and academic studies over the period 1985–2010. GREs are a global phenomenon emanating from new public management reforms and while assessments of university research have been welcomed, they have attracted critique based on their design, the manner in which they have been applied, and the unintended consequences of their implementation on academic freedom in particular. Consistent with international research on the impact of GREs, Australian research assessments appear to be undoing the academic freedom that is central to successful research. Further empirical research on the impact of GREs on academics is urgently needed.  相似文献   

Evaluating academic development in the higher education sector: academic developers’ reflections on using a toolkit resource     

Jennie Winter  Rebecca Turner  Lucy Spowart  Reema Muneer  Pauline Kneale 《高等教育研究与发展》2017,36(7):1503-1514

The professionalisation of teaching is of increasing importance in UK higher education due to converging processes including the proliferation of managerialism, increasing quality agendas and changes to student fee structures. These have brought into sharp relief the need for greater understanding of how quality teaching evolves in university settings. One key element of this involves academic development and its impacts on teaching and learning. Current literature suggests that a plethora of ideas, frameworks and instruments claiming best practice exist but that take-up of these is inconsistent. This prompted a UK national research project which produced an evidence-based toolkit for evaluating academic development. As part of the toolkit augmentation, academic development representatives from across the sector were asked to create, review and test uniquely tailored evaluation instruments. These instruments were then piloted on university teachers who had participated in teaching-related continuing professional development activities. This paper reports on these individuals’ reflections of using the toolkit. It suggests that academic developers are interested in evaluating the impact of their work on teachers, students and on the wider institutional culture but that confidence and expertise varies. Using the toolkit generated ‘traditional’ evaluation data including satisfaction with the development activity and changes to lecturers’ conceptions and behaviours. However, it also prompted critical discussions around current evaluation practice. This included the need for transformational reform of institutional culture to support links between evaluation and good standing; and making explicit the thorny issue of evidencing student learning. This paper will be of interest to those with an interest or responsibility for evaluating teaching in higher education. The paper offers an important contribution to the international literature at a time when global higher education is faced with questions about teaching, learning and quality. Evaluation, and how to do it well, is timely and important business.  相似文献